Conclusion: The intention and skill of an attacker will ultimately determine the impact of the attack, regardless of the preventative technologies an organisation has. In this respect, a skilled attacker intent on destruction is akin to a natural disaster: measures can be taken but ultimately it’s out of your hands. We cannot prevent floods and earthquakes, so what makes a difference is how organisations respond to these disasters. It is imperative that organisations with disaster recovery and crisis management processes extend these to include responding to cybercrime. The first area to look is at how the organisation will deal with not being in control of its own IT, including communications systems such as email and VoIP.

Existing Client Login



Read more ...

Related Articles:

"Preparing for cybercrime: incident response" IBRS, 2013-09-25 00:00:00

"Preparing for cybercrime; incident response Part 2" IBRS, 2013-11-27 00:00:00



James Turner

About The Advisor

James Turner

James Turner is an IBRS emeritus Advisor who specialised in cyber security and risk and facilitates the CIO Cyber and Risk Network on behalf of IBRS. James has over a decade of experience as an industry analyst and advisor; researching the cyber security industry in Australia. As an IBRS Advisor, James authored over 100 IBRS Advisory papers, led dozens of executive roundtables, and presented at numerous conferences.