Last Word: Microsoft Licensing: it's not all that bad, really...
As discussed in this month’s research note “Microsoft Licensing + Virtualisation = Licensing Confusion” Microsoft’s Licensing model is based on a physical machine model that is increasingly out of touch with the IT industry.
In the past, when computers did not have the processing power of today’s hardware and operating systems, and software was bound to the physical machine, binding licensing to the physical machine made absolute sense. When organisations wanted to get more computing power, they would buy more machines: which would see Microsoft getting more revenue. Consumption of software (arguably the value of IT in the eyes of users) was closely correlated to the physical machine.
About The Advisor
Dr. Joseph Sweeney is an IBRS advisor specialising in the areas of workforce transformation and the future of work, including; workplace strategies, end-user computing, collaboration, workflow and low code development, data-driven strategies, policy, and organisational cultural change. He is the author of IBRS’s Digital Workspaces methodology. Dr Sweeney has a particular focus on Microsoft, Google, AWS, VMWare, and Citrix. He often assists organisations in rationalising their licensing spend while increasing workforce engagement. He is also deeply engaged in the education sector. Joseph was awarded the University of Newcastle Medal in 2007 for his studies in Education, and his doctorate, granted in 2015, was based on research into Australia’s educational ICT policies for student device deployments.