VENDORiQ: Going Down the Rabbit Hole: A Deep Dive into a Flawed AI Product

Discover the hidden truths behind a vendor's flawed AI product, emphasising the importance of transparency and due diligence in tech investments.

The Latest

Rabbit R1 is a tech product developed by Rabbit Incorporated, which secured tens of millions in venture capital. The company, led by CEO Jesse Lyu, promised the R1 would perform tasks such as ordering food, calling rides, and planning trips. Despite these ambitious claims, the product has been criticised for being non-functional. 

Rabbit Incorporated was originally registered as Cyber Manufacture Co., which raised venture capital for a project focused on NFTs called Gamma. Both projects have faced scrutiny for failing to deliver on their promises.

Why It’s Important

The significance of the revelations centres on accountability and trust within the AI industry.

The rapid pivot from an NFT project to an AI assistant like Rabbit R1 raises critical questions about corporate transparency and the true capabilities of their technological claims. Despite attempts to distance the current Rabbit project from Gamma, the overlapping teams and leadership question the integrity of the company’s promises. 

From an operational standpoint, the accusations against Rabbit Incorporated point to a potential misuse of venture capital, given the ambiguous results of both Gamma and Rabbit R1.

Worse, Rabbit R1’s supposed AI capabilities have been exposed as largely non-functional, depending instead on hard-coded scripts and simpler automation, contrary to the sophisticated AI models advertised. 

Such misleading representations of AI severely harm the credibility of genuine AI innovations and initiatives. 

The company’s past and present dealings highlight a crucial need for rigorous due diligence when evaluating tech investments, particularly those laden with AI buzzwords and expansive promises.  All vendors should be reviewed from both non-functional (business stability and risks) and functional perspectives.  IBRS advises clients to be doubly cautious when reviewing the current market’s flood of AI vendors.

Who Is Impacted?

  • Chief technology officers (CTOs)
  • Product managers
  • Procurement teams

What’s Next?

  • Evaluate Vendor Claims: Scrutinise vendor claims beyond initial pitch decks. Confirm proof-of-concept and performance in real-world conditions.
  • Conduct Thorough Background Checks: Perform thorough due diligence on vendor history, particularly if there have been rapid pivots in project focus.
  • Monitor User Feedback: Continually monitor user feedback and industry reviews for any red flags or performance issues.
  • Security and Privacy Reviews: Perform extensive security and data privacy audits, especially if the product claims extensive, sensitive personal data handling.

Trouble viewing this article?

Search