Robotic Process Automation

The Latest

1 March 2022. Microsoft recently launched Carbon Call with ClimateWorks Foundation and more than 20 other leading organisations in the private, philanthropic, scientific and non-governmental sectors to develop more reliable and interoperable carbon emissions accounting practices. The collaboration is expected to address and solve gaps in current global carbon accounting systems, with a focus on carbon removal and land sector, methane, and indirect emissions. 

Why it’s Important

There has been a noticeable growth in the number of hyperscale Cloud vendors publicising their efforts to reduce their carbon footprint and energy consumption levels. Such growth outnumbers the total of on-premise data centre services that are following the same move towards carbon-free energy sources and more sustainable ICT operations.

This reflects the industry’s answer to the immediate call for action on climate change and the economic advantages of hyperscale. However, global standards for sustainability reporting still vary widely, according to a study published by the International Federation of Accountants and the Association of International Certified Professional Accountants. The lack of a robust set of sustainability-related reporting standards presupposes that any vendor may overstate its claims of adhering to a climate-first approach, further relegating corporate reporting across a range of environmental, social and governance (ESG) areas into suspicion.

But progress has been made since. In November, during the 2021 UN Climate Change Conference (COP26), the International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation proposed the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) to bring the much needed transparency in reporting across different industries, enterprises and regions.

Microsoft's adoption of an emerging global standard for reporting reflects the next stage of the trend towards ICT sustainability issues. By 2025, IBRS expects that not only all the hyperscale Cloud vendors will have adopted a standardised carbon report, but most of the top Fortune 500 companies will be following suit. Around this time, it is expected that public sector shared services will be put under greater scrutiny to do the same move towards carbon-free energy sources with a globally agreed set of standards.

Who’s impacted

  • COO, CIO, CTO
  • Data centre managers
  • Corporate risk and policy directors
  • Sustainability managers

What’s Next?

Organisations must learn to start monitoring trends in sustainable computing, especially among the hyperscale Cloud vendors. As all organisations will soon be obliged to adhere to a consistent, harmonised and global set of sustainability reporting standards that will help define collective enterprise reporting and accountability, be prepared for boards to request standardised ICT sustainability reporting. This will enhance their commitment to actively participating in collecting and reporting sustainability information and the credibility of their report. 

Finally, organisations must consider what solutions may be needed to integrate ESG in creating value for the organisation over the long term, rather than attempting to build such capabilities in-house with existing analytics platforms. 

Related IBRS Advisory

  1. VENDORiQ: Cloud Vendors will Push New Wave of Sustainable ICT Strategies
  2. VENDORiQ: Oracle Announces Innovation Lab During COP26 Summit

The Latest

22 February 2022: Process intelligence and automation company Nintex announced its acquisition of robotic process automation (RPA) developer Kryon. Australian low-code vendor Nintex, plans to improve its intelligent process automation (IPA) features through Kryon’s process discovery technology capabilities and full cycle RPA with artificial intelligence (AI).

As a process management and automation software builder, Nintex offers low-code design platforms for IT teams, operations experts and business analysts. Some of its largest clients in Australia include Naylor Love, Toyota Australia, Arab Bank Australia, RICOH, Auswide Bank, Port Stephens Council in New South Wales, Auto & General Holdings, and Allegis Group who have benefitted from its low-code development tools to help employees, regardless of their programming expertise, create applications that solve unique enterprise challenges.

Why it’s Important

Nintex’s move to acquire Kryon is yet another example of the merging of all low-code tools (i.e., process singularity) and how mid-tier low-code vendors are pushing up the low-code spectrum. This broad ecosystem of solutions, each with unique traits and features that fit specific organisational structures, should have specific modern low-code platforms that match an organisation’s ecosystem to help better streamline operational processes. In addition, constantly ensuring governance features to avoid the chaos that can ensue from unfettered development when acquiring low-code platforms is crucial in the long-term for better return on investment (ROI) whatever low-code solution is selected.

Nintex is also one of the many Australian companies that have exhibited fast-growing performances in the international market recently through acquisitions and mergers. However, as previously noted by IBRS, most local enterprises and the national government have lower regard for smaller Australian vendors making a name abroad. In many cases, smaller local vendors offer better value and generally have positive project outcomes as a result of their vested interest in meeting their clients’ expectations.

Who’s impacted

  • COO, CIO, CTO
  • Business analysts

What’s Next?

IBRS recently conducted a market scan on low-code vendor trends and found out that large vendors will continue acquiring today’s most successful low-code platform companies until 2025. This will help expand their product portfolios to secure a majority of market share. In this regard, when looking at low-code platforms, organisations must consider the greater ecosystem of low-code tools that will meet their long-term needs. For instance, vendors that can offer a more robust platform that caters to internet of things (IoT) solutions can help organisations focus on IoT devices and controllers instead of hardware and software development integrations.

Related IBRS Advisory

  1. Low-Code Mythbusting
  2. Hammering Low-Code into Place Takes Time
  3. Low-Code Platform Feature Checklist
  4. VENDORiQ: What Marketplacer Shows Us About Buying Aussie Tech

The Latest

30 November 2021: Enterprise automation software firm UiPath collaborates with business schools to support student training on robotic process automation (RPA). This is part of their program to develop students’ skills in automation technologies, especially for business and finance majors. The strategy is aimed at growing future demand for RPA among business (as opposed to technical) staff.

Why it’s Important

Microsoft successfully transformed MS Excel into a standard spreadsheet software program in universities and enterprises, and edged out Lotus 1-2-3 and Quattro Pro in the ‘80s. Having Excel built into the curriculum of most schools at that time solidified Excel’s adoption.

In a one-on-one executive interview with IBRS, UiPath’s executive revealed that while it is a relatively young vendor, it has donated millions of dollars to business schools as part of the company’s Academic Alliance partnerships. In the ANZ region, this includes:

  • University of Melbourne
  • Deakin University
  • Tower Australian College
  • University of Tasmania
  • Swinburne University of Technology
  • University of Wollongong
  • University of Auckland
  • Auckland University of Technology

UiPath’s goal is to train students early in using personal software robots to support the automation of manual processes, build smarter assistants, and create their startup similar to how Microsoft influenced developing spreadsheet skills in the ‘80s and ‘90s. In other words, the company is developing a new type of use case in the business and finance department where the launch of a non-IT version of the RPA will mean creating a domain for business majors, and not just for the IT department.

IBRS predicts that since RPA is rapidly becoming merged within the low-code everything ecosystem, it will play a vital role in business and finance even if it will take some more time for the technology to provide insights, predict outcomes and exercise self-healing. 

Who’s impacted

  • Educational policymakers
  • CIOs
  • Educational ICT strategy leads 
  • Principals and senior leadership of higher education institutions
  • Digital workspace teams

What’s Next?

IBRS recommends CIOs prepare for RPA to become a standard business staff tool over the next three to 10 years. Its accelerated adoption in universities will expand its scope of automating rule-based digital processes and advanced cognitive automation on unstructured data sources across industries. Furthermore, organisations need to recognise the shift in management approaches and process discovery by adopting more sophisticated solutions that will leverage no-code tools and AI-driven technology to achieve their target ROI.

Related IBRS Advisory

  1. Dr Sweeney on the Post-COVID Lessons for Education (Video Interview)
  2. Higher Education Technology Future State Vision
  3. Trends for 2021-2026: No new normal and preparing for the fourth-wave of ICT

The Latest

23 November 2021: SoftIron is developing an Australian facility to manufacture it’s high-performance data processing appliance. This is the company’s second facility after its California factory and they have plans to develop another centre in Berlin in the coming years. The planned edge manufacturing facility is expected to be the first component level computer manufacturing hub in Australia for several decades.

SoftIron’s New South Wales manufacturing facility is supported by a AU$1.5 million grant from the Department of Defence. The hardware provided by SoftIron will include open-source appliances for high performance data processing.

The vendor will leverage smaller-scale, automated ‘edge manufacturing’ systems and effectively side-step global supply chain bottlenecks.  

SoftIron claims that security-minded clients, such as the Australian Government, are increasingly concerned about the risks of supply chains that include foriegn entities suspected to have inserted spyware. Governments are already applying bans on foreign providers of communications and data processing hardware that power modern data centres. SoftIron claims the ability for clients to verify every aspect of a product - from the open source code to the supply chain of components and manufacturing cycle - is critical for trust in data centre appliance.

Why it’s Important

SoftIron’s entry into Australian tech manufacturing is welcome. Australia’s technology tech manufacturing was decimated by large-scale overseas production capabilities in the mid to late 80s, despite having some extraordinary world-leading products. For example, the world’s first battery-powered laptop, the Dulmont Magnum (aka the Kookaburra) designed and manufactured in Australia in 1984. Hartley Computers developed hardware and software locally in the same decade, before concentrating on supporting imported Wang minicomputers.

The SoftIron announcement raises several important considerations:

Supply Chain Risk

Procuring hardware from an foriegn manufacturing plants (such as POS and telecommunication systems) is now being flagged as a possible point of exposure to business espionage and spying. The complexity of international supply chains combined with the opaqueness of the firmware and code running on tech products, opens up many avenues for criminal and state actors to inject malware into products sold overseas. While China is a target of US suspicions, it should be noted that Australia's allies have engaged in similar activities in the past: in particular the US and Germany with encryption technologies, and the recent use of the ANoM phone app used to ensnare criminals.  

For Australian enterprises, the lack of visibility into the supply chain should be a growing concern. The only way to address this concern is to adopt a risk assessment policy that includes verifiability of the supply chain, and the firmware and code of products.

Support Chain

Edge manufacturing (aka micro-manufacturing) leverages the ever lowering costs of robotic manufacturing systems and (importantly) the lowering cost of programming such robots, to compete against the cost-efficiencies of huge factories in lower labor-cost countries. 

Technology manufacturing firms have traditionally driven costs down through economies of scale and labor savings. However, the global supply chain crunch due to the pandemic and slow-moving trade wars, coupled with rising labor costs globally, is causing a change in the equilibrium of manufacturing. 

Edge manufacturing employs robotic technologies and short-run production automation to deliver specialised products at a faster rate, at costs that are within the realm of those offered by large scale manufacturing, when transport, warehousing and related global supply chain costs are considered.  Edge manufacturing is less susceptible (though not immune) to global supply chain disruptions. 

Most importantly, edge manufacturing is highly agile and their entire manufacturing process is verifiable, making the model attractive for security conscious buyers. Finally, firms that locate their facilities here are covered by Australian laws and are therefore required to be certified to a compliance standard to ensure the level of data security is being met.

Who’s impacted

  • CIO
  • CFO
  • Procurement managers

What’s Next?

IBRS believes that the national economy has a solid potential to benefit from edge manufacturing.  Recent economic modelling by IBRS and Insight Economics noted a 10% increase in organisations buying Australian software (as opposed to US and European solutions) would return close to a $1.5 billion uplift in the economy within a decade. This economic benefit would be significantly magnified if hardware was added.

Organisations can examine the premium put on closer collaboration with suppliers and vendors through this business model by:

  • Running a hypothetical stress tests on their current supply chain to understand how it affects their financial standing
  • Utilising local vendors while considering a third party risk assessment and compliance program that will fit their cyber security strategy
  • Assessing a vendor’s governance framework using the IBRS Vendor Governance Maturity Model

Related IBRS Advisory

  1. How does your organisation manage cyber supply chain risk?
  2. Vendor governance framework (VGF): Evaluate maturity to manage growth and risks
  3. Strategic vendor management in government
  4. Challenges when conducting business impact analysis

The Latest

23 March 2021: ServiceNow has signed an agreement to purchase robotic process automation vendor, Intellibot. The deal will see Indian-based Intellibot, which was founded in 2015, embedded into the ServiceNow platform. 

Why it’s Important

RPA is rapidly becoming merged within the low-code everything ecosystem. ServiceNow’s planned investment in buying into RPA is not surprising: other low-code vendors, such as Nintex, have already secured their RPA solutions through acquisition. Buyers of standard-alone RPA solutions can expect more acquisitions, followed by rapid market consolidation in 3-5 years time. 

Who’s Impacted

  • CIO
  • Development team leads
  • Business analysts

What’s Next?

Expect RPA to play an increasing role in areas such as customer account creation and management, customer verification, employee on-boarding and off-boarding, data extraction and migration, and claims and invoice processing, among others.

Related IBRS Advisory

  1. Exploring Robotic Process Automation
  2. How Can AI Reimagine Your Business Processes?
  3. Cloud Low-code Vendor Webflow Secures US$140 Million
  4. Aussie Vendor Radar: Nintex Joins the Mainstream Business Process Automation Vendor Landscape
  5. SNAPSHOT: A Robotic Process Automation Infographic